Games
Making fun
0You might expect it to be a given, but as a game developer, I like to create fun for other people. And also have fun for myself of course. However this is not an automatic in this industry. Some people just want to get the job done and go home to their own world. Also some people do not find the game they make fun, either because they are no longer interested in games, or their own product is not good. Thankfully now I am with a group that makes fun games, and wants to make fun games. These two things are painstakingly obviously connected, but some companies don’t grasp this idea.
The past few months I feel like I’ve succeeded in creating a product that is fun, now this product needs to connect with the audience of gamers. This connection has not gone very smoothly and people keep playing against mostly AI which is less fun, but I have to trust that some people are having fun. The barrier to entry is low, but you do need to pay a membership cost to play. I got a free membership because I work on it, and have popped in the free realms world to see a crowd outside the big pirate ship where they start the game.
Here’s a vid I made, and here’s a screenshot of me owning everyone. I never have felt so guilty in beating someone — I did make the game after all.
Google Buzz Thoughts
0
As a user of twitter, google reader, picasa, youtube, and blog writing, I was initially intrigued about the concept of Google Buzz. It is basically an aggregated update about what google thinks makes up my online ‘life’. Photos of me, articles I like, random twitterish thoughts all can be pushed to people who subscribe automatically. Then they can comment directly on them or pass them on to their subscriber list. (more…)
Street Fighter 4
0Street Fighter 4 A-
by Capcom from Feb 2009
I’d really like a cybernetic left thumb. Perhaps one of my eyes. But specifically the thumb would be for long street fighter 4 sessions. However with a sore thumb, I must say, Street Fighter 4 is amazing and I am surprised at how much fun it is to wave a color changing scarf.

(more…)
Chrome
0
Google is generally the company who does things right. Features you want are there, or you’ll change what you want to match their features (hooray for gmail labels!) Things are organized cleanly and logically. Performance is generally pretty good, or some things like mail can be scaled down if you’re mobile or bandwidth handicapped. Their search has become the verb for searching. I’m not sure why its the best, or if the search part of google is all that great (lots of room for improvement IMO), but google is .. google.
When chrome came out, I tried it, and wasn’t too sure it was really even necessary in the browser market. It looked pretty similar to firefox, internet explorer with slight rearrangement. The performance could be better or worse but comparing half a second or a full second is hard for me to judge, especially when my internet connection could be attributed to any delay.
I switched back to firefox because of some features (plug-ins) that I found it hard to go without. FoxyTunes to control my music, and volume is fantastic. Greasemonkey lets me do some advanced script things on certain websites. FireFTP has become my ftp app of choice which is quite bizarre because firefox doesn’t really have anything to do with ftp. FireFTP is just an application inside of a browser I guess? It isn’t perfect but its there , and quick.
But here I am writing this blog on Chrome, so why did I abandon my old foxy browser? It was boggin me down. Too often firefox would take forever to close, or take forever to start up. Could this be due to my plugins? very likely. Also on some evil website with heavy multimedia or scripting usage, my firefox grinds to a halt and crashes too often.
What is google’s solution? Tabs are separate tasks, and don’t crash each other. Also, a few nice features I had in firefox, like a 9 panel multipage preview screen, is built in. The download manager I love in firefox (popup windows are so 2003) is built in chrome, and probably even better.
But the biggest thing is that Chrome is just better on my underpowered laptop, it doesn’t hog giants amount of memory to slow down my games on my desktop, its just less intrusive. I never have to scream “bah Chrome is acting up!” like i do with firefox. I never (not yet) have to go in task manager and kill chrome from doing whatever startup or shutdown crap its doing. So, all in all, I’ll have to find new way to use FTP (using a cygwin shell is more fun anyway) and also to control my music I’m starting to use the magic buttons on my keyboard more, or the taskbar miniversion of WMP11.
I hope some new features get added into chrome, I saw a sky blue browser and i want it painted black! (and some music control would be nice again…)
Games should kill Television
0People don’t live in ‘reality’ 100% of the time. I think a game can be made for every non-reality desire. And I think it can cross over into real world too.
I love games, and I’ve been listening to a bunch of game developer conference lectures and they love games too.
One thing I like is that Jane McGonigal said she wants to kill television. Me too. It is a one way static medium. Just like radio shows died because they lacked visuals. Television too should die because it lacks interactivity. I don’t care if you want to watch pop singers compete, it should still be a game. You should still have the option to manipulate it, give your input, see output changed, even participate. Instead of watching an action show, why can’t you play one, or if you aren’t feeling particularly active, make it more automated and dictated. How about comedy? Can you make a comedy game that is intelligently written and fresh like a tv show? Some ‘funny’ games have come out, but they just insert laugh gags that will get stale, that is not what a tv comedy show is about. Can we do interactive humour? Or a comedy writer-written non-player-character? What would it be like to have a role in an episode of the office? Maybe too many people are unfunny and lack confidence and skills to participate, but I think we should try to make that a game. I run improv drama games at camp and it _can_ work. Lower expectations, have some guidance and boom, its a fun game
I’d play it.
What about killing the telephone too. I find it hard to gab on the phone, looking at a wall, but if both parties were engaged in a common activity, or could see each other, or representations of each other, I think it works a lot better. I wish emotional feedback could be more accurately represented than emoticons!
Although I hate social ‘games’ that have no meat. Its hard to do it without being unbelievably bad.
Can we kill music in its static form? It already is sorta happening with guitar hero and rock band. How else can it be made interactive. Dance games too, add new elements to music. These things if made easier could turn music into a game at all times, last.fm tracks music played, it could sort of be a game too.
What about cooking? eating even? Or running? (gdc lady suggested nike plus be a MMO)
Dating/Flirting already is a game, can we track it? Or create a system around it to make it better? easier for people to find what they want? e-dating does this, but do people consider this to be a game? There are also a lot of these elements in games, but do people consider that flirting/dating?
Where does the line between game and reality cross?
====
I love games though for a few reasons
- Games connect you with people, real or imaginary. … although too many are uninspired and lifeless, but this is a problem both in real life and imaginary land.
- Games have character, they conjure up feelings or experiences otherwise impossible.
- Games have environments, new worlds, wildly changing, thoroughly detailed and immersive.
- Games have Mario, who I think I almost consider as a friend?
- Games have Megaman, who I think is just unbelieveably cool looking, arm is a gun, can slide along ground, swing a sword, adapt to new guns, upgradable parts, you can see his face and big smile. “ya!”. A sweet soundtrack, I want those things!
- Games have trackable progress, leveling up
- Games have “showtime moments” boss battles, adrenaline rushes
- Games have definitive victories, beating another player
- Games can give complete conclusion and accomplishment, beating the game
I wish I had these feelings in real life, or I wish I could conjure them in someone else. Reality or gaming-world.
I like making games.
SNES compilation
1SNES is my foundation for my love of video games. This video brings me such joy and inspiration
Ikaruga
0How do I spend a nice sunday afternoon trying to destress from some life issues? I play a game, a shmup or shoot em up vertical spaceship scroller. One renown for its difficulty and complexity. There are no fancy weapons that let you shoot sideways or sidekicks who save the day, no shields to save your but and the “bombs” to drop are earned.
That’s right, you earn bonuses by eating bullets the same color as you, and dodging bullets the opposite color as you. Sounds easy to keep straight right? No, cause you keep switching colors to enflict more damage. Also, in order to get any points at all really, you have to kill a batch of all the same color at once. That means while there is a black guy flying at you, you can’t kill him yet, because it would mess up your streak of whites to kill. So he flies on by, shooting at you, narrowly missing. It’s a cop who is on duty to catch sex offenders letting a drug dealer go by, but alas, he will switch to drug busting duty in a mere few seconds! Just this second that drug dealer is lucky, the next drug dealer is going to get a face full of bullets. and the cop will eat the drug dealers bullets for its bomb bonus, ya thats right, Eating bullets only to use it against you. That’s what ikaruga taught me.
(more…)
Upgrade your life ‘productivity’
0I use a RSS reader all the time and I mark a few things to be shared on the left little block titled “You might like…” but really, I don’t imagine its very noticeable. Well I want this item to be noticed because really it is a wealth of information, tips and tricks for using a computer smarter. I love lifehacker and this is a compilation blog post.
Ode to my x300, macbook air can go propel a kite
2So I brought my big beefy beast of a pc with me on the airplane, with a $40 overweight charge no less.
But I haven’t used it yet, other than to make sure it turns on. Why you might ask? Well I dont have a monitor yet and haven’t urgently needed one. Some time ago when my pocketpc got smashed I decided to look for another secondary computing device. I was browsing ebay for cheap small monitors which then turned to cheap small laptops which landed me looking at these dell x300s which I directly compare to the new macbook air which is all the buzz.




